Wednesday, March 25, 2026
Honor ALL of the Feelings
Tuesday, March 24, 2026
Self-Knowledge and Willpower Will Avail You Nothing
Monday, March 23, 2026
Everybody's Crazy
Here's another article about our ability to overcome things. While this is meant as an explanation of how resilient people are generally and how this directly affects their mental health I find a lot of relevance to how we recover or flounder or die from alcoholism. My A.A. protege and I have been trying to get in touch with the suddenly unresponsive new woman and having no success for a couple of days, never a good sign. Then, today, the new woman calls me - explaining that she has been working and hates texting, excuses, excuses, how we love excuses - and left me floundering as to how to explain the insanity of her behavior. Too busy with work and kids and an increasingly frustrated fiance to get some medical health for the shakes she gets when she tries to quit drinking cold turkey while realizing she's on the razor's edge of losing her job and kids and fiance but unable to bridge that gap of insane thinking to pick one or the other. It's heartbreaking. I literally didn't know what to say. I can only stress that as a non-professional I think she needs some medical help.
In 1966, a developmental psychologist named Diana Baumrind published a study that would change how we think about parenting. Working out of the University of California, Berkeley, she identified three distinct styles: authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive. Her research was groundbreaking. But here’s the thing that always strikes me about that timing.
My dad grew up in the 1960s, working-class, outside Manchester. His father worked in a factory and was involved in the union. His mother worked in retail. Nobody in that household was sitting around discussing feelings over dinner. What they discussed was politics, work, and whether things were fair or not.
Dad didn’t talk much about his childhood in sentimental terms. But the stories he did tell had a common thread. He walked to school alone. He sorted out his own problems. If he got into a scrap with another kid, no parent was phoning anyone. He dealt with it, or he didn’t, and either way he showed up the next day. That wasn’t unusual. It was just what childhood looked like.
What psychologists now recognise is that this kind of unsupervised, unstructured experience was quietly building something. Research psychologist Peter Gray, who has spent his career studying free play at Boston College, has argued that the contraction of children’s independent activity since the 1960s has made them markedly less resilient. Over several decades, as children’s freedom to play and explore without adult intervention declined, rates of anxiety, depression, and suicide among young people steadily climbed.
The uncomfortable conclusion? The very thing that felt like neglect was functioning as emotional training. There’s a concept in psychology called distress tolerance. It’s exactly what it sounds like: the ability to feel awful and not need it to stop immediately. To sit with discomfort without being destroyed by it. Children raised in the 1960s got daily practice in this without anyone calling it that. They waited for things. If they wanted to watch a programme, they had to be there when it aired. If they wanted something from a shop, they saved for it. If they were bored, tough. Nobody was handing them a screen.
As Gray explained, play is how children learn to direct their own activities, negotiate with peers, and deal with minor bullying. When adults constantly supervise and intervene, children never get the chance to develop those skills for themselves. The result, he argues, is that the first real emotional storms don’t arrive until eighteen instead of eight. And by then, the window for building certain coping mechanisms has narrowed considerably.
I think about my dad’s generation and the way they handled setbacks. Redundancies. Health scares. The slow erosion of the industries their towns were built on. They weren’t immune to pain. But they had this ballast, this underlying steadiness, that came from decades of small, unrescued difficulties stacking up into something solid.
Here’s where the data gets really striking. Gray’s research highlights work by psychologist Jean Twenge, who analysed decades of data on something called the “locus of control.” This measures whether someone believes they have control over their own life (internal) or whether they feel controlled by outside forces (external).
Twenge found that between 1960 and 2002, average scores among young people shifted dramatically toward the external end of the scale. By 2002, the average young person was more externally oriented than eighty percent of young people in the 1960s. And that shift tracked almost perfectly with the rise in anxiety. In other words, the generation raised in the 1960s didn’t just feel tougher. They had a fundamentally different relationship with their own agency. They believed they could influence what happened to them. And that belief, according to the research, is one of the strongest buffers against mental illness.
My grandparents lived through the war, and their stories made history feel like something that happened to real people, not just textbook stuff. That perspective filtered down. You didn’t sit around feeling sorry for yourself because you’d grown up hearing about people who’d survived actual catastrophes through sheer will and stubbornness. It recalibrated what counted as a crisis.
None of this means we should go back to telling children to toughen up. The 1960s produced resilience, but it also produced a generation that often couldn’t talk about what was hurting them. Emotional suppression was the norm. Mental health was stigmatised. There were blind spots that did real harm.
I’ve mentioned this before but I think one of the most important things I’ve learned from reading psychology and history is that you can hold two truths at once. The 1960s got some things right by accident. It also got some things badly wrong on purpose.
But the overcorrection is worth thinking about. Play is how children develop the character traits needed to become independent adults. When we protect them from every bump, we’re not building confidence. We’re quietly communicating that they can’t handle things on their own.
The parenting culture of the 1960s didn’t intend to build emotional resilience. Parents were just busy. They were stretched thin. They were following a culture that expected children to handle a fair amount on their own. But in the gap between needing something and getting it, between facing a problem and finding help, something important was being forged.
I lost my dad a few years ago. And in the weeks and months that followed, I found myself thinking a lot about the kind of person he was. Steady. Unflappable in ways that sometimes frustrated me when I was younger but that I came to admire deeply as I got older. a therapist. He didn’t journal. He didn’t meditate. He just had this core of something that held him together through redundancies, through my parents’ difficult years, through watching his own hometown change beyond recognition as the jobs disappeared.
Was some of that problematic? Probably. He could have talked more. He could have let people in more. But the underlying steadiness was real, and it came from somewhere. It came from a childhood where nobody rescued you from discomfort because nobody thought discomfort was something you needed rescuing from.
Psychologists aren’t suggesting we recreate the 1960s. What they’re suggesting is something more nuanced: that we’ve removed so much friction from modern life, especially from childhood, that we’ve accidentally eliminated the raw material resilience is built from.
The generation raised in that era didn’t choose to be tough. They were shaped by a world that didn’t consider their emotional comfort a priority. And paradoxically, that lack of comfort gave them something that no amount of well-meaning intervention can easily replicate.
Resilience isn’t a personality trait. It’s a skill, and like all skills, it needs to be practised. The 1960s provided that practice automatically, woven into the fabric of daily life. Today, we have to be more intentional about it.
That doesn’t mean being harsh with ourselves or our children. It means resisting the urge to smooth every rough edge. It means letting small problems run their course. It means understanding that the ability to sit with discomfort, to tolerate uncertainty, to believe you can handle what comes next, these things aren’t born. They’re built.
And they’re built, more often than not, in the moments when no one is coming to help.
Any Advice? From Me?
Saturday, March 21, 2026
It's Not Them?! It's NOT Them!!
I have found over the years that there are threads that exist in most philosophies that center around human behavior and that these threads can be found in Twelve Step programs and in a lot of modern medicine. I've taken the time to share this article written by the psychologist Dr. Robert Puff and found in the magazine Psychology Today. I don't know anything about this guy and I've never read the magazine so I'm not shilling or advocating for either but I loved the sentiments. To wit: We do not control other people. We do not control the political system or the people at our jobs or the weather or the traffic patterns. We control none of it. None of it! We have control over one thing and one thing only: our behavior, our reaction to these things out of our control and if we work hard on improving ourselves then our alignment with the rest of existence improves.
Every time I write about these amazing, baffling, incomprehensible spiritual principles - thinking of others before I think about myself and leaving the rest of the world to their own devices - I'm tempted to rebel. This kind of approach to life can't possibly be workable. I think about others before myself?! Insanity! Apostasy! The world is out there spinning today. What can I do about that? Not very much. I know this to be true: I have tried to control things that are out of my control for years and years - I still do it today! - and I have rarely succeeded and when I have bent the world to my own design it rarely makes me happy.
So don't use your turn signals today! Fuck do I care!?
Here's the article:
"When I was in high school, I found out I had an ulcer. I kept waking up in the middle of the night with these intense stomach pains that wouldn’t go away. I finally dragged myself to the doctor to figure out the issue. He asked me lots of questions about myself and my habits until he finally discovered that I drank soda every single day. He said that was the cause of the ulcer and if I wanted my pain to go away, I had to cut soda out of my life. Once I made this change, my pain did in fact go away and never came back.
Now, I’m going to share a silly story—and stick with me because I promise there’s a purpose. Let’s say I went to the doctor and I asked, “Hey Doc, can you give me something to give to my boss so he stops scheduling me to work so much?“ or “Hey Doc, what can I do to fix my teachers who are giving me tons of homework?” She would look at me like I had two heads!
The moral here is, when we go to the doctor, we want them to fix us, not the people who are in our lives. We do this not because other people can’t cause us stress, they certainly do, but we’re not in control of those people. This is why when we go to the doctor, they prescribe us medicine, not the people who are causing us suffering.
(Man, how great would that be? Doctors fixing other people.)
Just like our doctors can’t control or fix outside forces in our lives, we can’t control the psychological stress people may put on us. What we can do is change who we are. When we struggle, we have a tendency to want to blame others for our problems. I’ve seen this countless times as a practicing psychologist. What I like to remind my patients is that we’re not in control of other people’s actions, but we are in control of our response.
By putting the control back into our hands, we now have a sense of power over our own healing. When we focus our attention on the actions of others, we waste our energy.
Let me use an example to illustrate this. As a clinical psychologist, I’ve helped many couples improve their marriages over the years. Here’s what almost always happens when these couples enter my office: They list the things that are wrong with each other and ask for me to help fix each other. Here’s what I tell them: “Imagine if all of your energy went towards improving yourself, and being the best partner you can possibly be?”
This is because it’s hugely beneficial to our relationships when we focus on ourselves. It allows us to look in the mirror and say that we like the person looking back at us. When we’re happy with ourselves, we can take the time to see if our partners are treating us in the way we deserve to be treated. I recommend when you’re in a situation with your partner where you feel as though they are treating you unfairly, to turn inward and perhaps get quiet with your own thoughts, or remove yourself from the situation entirely if need be.
Again, we only have control over our internal selves, not the external world. The key is to focus on our own behavior, not other people’s. There are many circumstances of life such as our parents, our socioeconomic background, where we’re from, etc. that we don’t have any control over. It may feel tempting to focus on these things that are out of our control, but I’m challenging you to switch your focus to the things you can control.
For example, perhaps you don’t make much money, and this is frustrating to you. I challenge you to zoom outwards and think about the people who make less money than you but are also happy. What this allows us to do is really get to the heart of why this lack of money is upsetting. In many cases, it’s our attachment, and wishing that the external world was different.
But, what if we reframed our thinking to be centered around making the most of what we have? We’ll have more time to spend with people we love, doing things that fill us with joy like getting outside and practicing gratitude and acceptance for what we do have.
When we focus on the things that are in our control, we have the opportunity to change our own thinking. A lot of the time we struggle because we wish things were different or we see things negatively rather than positively.
For example, when I drive with other people, they will point out rude drivers to me that I didn’t even notice. Maybe I noticed that they were fast, but I didn’t dedicate the time to even notice that they were acting rude. I am only focused on myself while driving, which is something that I really enjoy. I only have control over my own actions, not the impatience of these other Southern California drivers.
It’s imperative that we stop focusing on what other people do. We can create boundaries around these people to protect ourselves, but again, that is for our own benefit, not theirs. It is very difficult to change other people, but we have the power to make adjustments to ourselves.
What this looks like in practice is this—if you’re in a situation that is causing you anxiety or stress, you may ask yourself, “What can I do in this instance to make things better for myself?” Notice how this is very different than asking, “What can I do to make this person stop doing what they’re doing because it is stressing me out?” The solution to problems lies within ourselves, not others.
This may feel overwhelming at first, but I also think that can be an empowering feeling. It takes the control out of the hands of others and places it back into our own. We are in control of our reactions and our own happiness. And when we focus on improving ourselves vs. the actions of others, we’ll find that happiness is always within an arm’s reach."
Friday, March 20, 2026
More Plain Language For Ya
Thursday, March 19, 2026
Wasn't Me . . . Or Was It?
Monday, March 16, 2026
Bluntly Said
Sunday, March 15, 2026
Sneaking Up On Spirituality, Dressed in Black, Late at Night
Saturday, March 14, 2026
The Angel of Death Part II
"That is what, in the Toltec way, the Angel of Death teaches us. The Angel of Death comes to us and says, 'You see everything that exists here is mine. It is not yours. Your house, your spouse, your children, your car, your career, your money - everything is mine and I can take it away when I want to, but for now you can use it."
I was so afraid of being uncomfortable before I staggered into The Rooms. I was terrified of pain. I tried to avoid it or make it go away and when I couldn't manage the world in a way that stopped the pain I simply buried it under drugs and alcohol. And Death? Hoo Wee that was a whole big can of whoop-ass. I couldn't think about that at all. Why so much fear? That is the million dollar question, isn't it? I had no perspective. I had no ability to look outside my own little prison of self-regard and see that pain and death are facts of life, part of the Nature of Existence. Now that I don't run screaming into the night whenever I'm in pain - or, worse yet, anticipating being in pain even though that doesn't happen often and when it does I have the tools and support to deal with it - it has nowhere near the hold on me that it used to. I understand, in my limited, very human way, that pain and death is coming and there ain't too much I can do about it. In the olden days, before we stuffed old age and death into sterile nursing homes and mortuaries and hospitals, the family was responsible for cleaning up and dressing the body and preparing it for viewing by friends and family. It couldn't have been easy, doing that, but it made death more intimate and immediate and real, less terrifying, to see the reality right there in your face and not tucked away somewhere, covered up with a white sheet, lying on a stainless steel table under buzzing fluorescent lights.
Friday, March 13, 2026
Here Comes the Angel of Death
Thursday, March 12, 2026
Roving Managerial Types
Wednesday, March 11, 2026
California Sober
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
Sin and Mercy
Monday, March 9, 2026
Fade Into Black
Sunday, March 8, 2026
Seriously, It's Not My Fault - Clearly, It's Your Fault
Here are a few reflections, a few impressions from Doctor Silkworth about Bill's spiritual awakening which are found in the chapter "Bill's Story" in the Plain Language Big Book: "I realized that he hadn't just changed how he thought and felt. He had changed his entire being. Knowing he was not alone had saved him from hopelessness. Maybe God could guide these alcoholics toward a strength they could not find alone. He just needed to accept that he was not the only person or force guiding his life."
Here is Bill talking to Ebby, his first guide and sponsor, about the amends process as it was originally devised by the Oxford Group: "I promised that I wouldn't blame these people or criticize them during our conversations. I just wanted to make things right between us. If I ever felt doubt or confusion, I should sit quietly and ask God for direction and strength. If I prayed, I should not pray for myself unless I was asking for wisdom I could use to help other people."
Bill, of course, being a good alcoholic took the Oxford Group's six steps and doubled them. Hey, if six is good then twelve has to be better, right? You can sense the realization that it was going to be very important to keep everything on our side of the street. When there's conflict or disagreement among humans it's very natural to try to pin the blame on the other person regardless of whether or not it's the other person's fault. Intuitively most of us understand that apologizing and then adding that stupid, stupid word "But . . . " is not going to work out very well. It doesn't even matter what comes after the But. It's the But that kills you. The But changes the amend from "I'm sorry" to "You made me do it." Sounds easy, doesn't it? Well, it's not and it's especially not when the other person has in fact behaved poorly himself.
Many meetings close with either "The Promises" or "A Vision for You" to stress that all is well, that all is going to be well. We can also find all kinds of promises scattered throughout the texts. Again from The Plain Language book: "I began to make some important friendships and build a community. It's wonderful to feel part of a group that understands what I've been through. The work is hard but we actually have a lot of fun doing it. Some people might be shocked to hear a group of sober alcoholics joking and laughing together, but the humor keeps us sane."
Insane: Lacking the ability to think and behave in ways considered to be normal; exhibiting a severely disordered state of mind.
Saturday, March 7, 2026
Grandpa Knows
Friday, March 6, 2026
Special Jeff and Me
Thursday, March 5, 2026
Big Clangs and Dull Thuds
Wednesday, March 4, 2026
The Plain Language Big Book
In the MOMENT
Tuesday, March 3, 2026
Penguin Doodling
The Lake of Fire
Sunday, March 1, 2026
Again With the Gratitude List
Saturday, February 28, 2026
Who's The Real Idiot?
There's a guy that has been a regular at my meeting since he got sober. He was an angry guy. He was so angry that he was tagged by some of our more sarcastic members with the sobriquet "Angry Chris" which - of course - pissed him off. He's been coming to meetings for seven or eight years and he has gotten a lot less angry and watching these kinds of transformations are one of the great joys of my life. If someone doesn't use a turn signal in front of him his old reptile brain still brands that driver as an idiot - that's his essential Chris-ness - but it doesn't make him mad anymore . . . or not as mad anyway. I love seeing people change without losing touch with the kind of person they are. He's still Chris but he's "Fun Angry Chris" now.
I think of my own growth in The Program. I've always had what I call a dry sense of humor and it no longer irritates me when someone suggests instead that I'm sorta a sarcastic pain in the ass because there's probably some truth in that. That's my essential Seaweed-ness. If I didn't have a dry sense of humor I wouldn't be me and most of the time I like me just fine. But what I needed to do was to learn how to make this dryness playful and kind and not cutting and judgemental. I bet if you heard newly sober Seaweed say the same thing to the same person - the exact same words - that thirty-eight year sober Seaweed would say you'd cringe at the old Seaweed and laugh with the new Seaweed. Same words - different effect. Something would be off with the impact of the old Seaweed. You'd wince a bit.
I feel like what I've been able to do over the years is to rub off the rough edges of the old Seaweed and add some putty and bondo to the underdeveloped parts and come up with a new and improved Seaweed. Funny and kind Seaweed instead of arrogant and unkind Seaweed. That's the improvement. But as weird as it sounds I still retain some of my arrogance and judgemental nature. That's the essential, the authentic Seaweed. I still think I'm better than everyone else and I still think everyone else is an idiot. I think you're an idiot and I don't even know who you are.
The good thing is that I DO know who the REAL idiot is.